IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v191y2024ics1364032123010717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral licensing and habits: Do solar households make negligent choices?

Author

Listed:
  • McCarthy, Breda

Abstract

Orienting household behaviors towards more efficient use of energy in the home is crucial to climate change mitigation efforts. The objective of this work is to examine the social-psychological antecedents of energy curtailment in solar households. Using an online survey (n = 257) of solar households in Australia, the study validates an augmented model of planned behavior using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The study shows that the path of a standard construct, from perceived behavioral control to intentions, is interrupted by moral licensing, a concept that has been largely ignored in studies applying the standard model of planned behavior. The study provides fresh insight into how consumers vindicate wasteful energy consumption behavior through moral licensing. Amongst its contributions, the study shows that social influence is the most important driver of intentions and behavior. The habitualised use of energy has a significant, negative effect on behavior. This work has several recommendations for retailers and policy makers in global energy markets on how to minimise licensing and negligent habits, and at the same time, it opens up new research avenues in the ethical consumption discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • McCarthy, Breda, 2024. "Moral licensing and habits: Do solar households make negligent choices?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s1364032123010717
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123010717
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s1364032123010717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.