IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v92y2007i7p983-991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability improvement through alternative designs—A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar, Saurabh
  • Chattopadhyay, Gopi
  • Kumar, Uday

Abstract

In today's competitive world, reliability of equipment is extremely important to maintain quality and delivery deadlines. This is achieved by using proper maintenance and design changes for unreliable subsystems and components of a complex system. It is significant to develop a strategy for maintenance, replacement and design changes related to those subsystems and components. An analysis of down time along with causes is essential to identify the unreliable components and subsystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar, Saurabh & Chattopadhyay, Gopi & Kumar, Uday, 2007. "Reliability improvement through alternative designs—A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 983-991.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:7:p:983-991
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832006001190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantine, A. G. & Robinson, N. I., 1997. "The Weibull renewal function for moderate to large arguments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 9-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarhan, Ammar M., 2009. "Reliability equivalence factors of a general series–parallel system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 229-236.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercier, Sophie, 2007. "Discrete random bounds for general random variables and applications to reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 378-405, February.
    2. Sotirios Losidis & Konstadinos Politis & Georgios Psarrakos, 2021. "Exact Results and Bounds for the Joint Tail and Moments of the Recurrence Times in a Renewal Process," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1489-1505, December.
    3. R. Jiang, 2022. "Two approximations of renewal function for any arbitrary lifetime distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 151-165, April.
    4. Jiang, R., 2020. "A novel two-fold sectional approximation of renewal function and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Halil Aydoğdu & İhsan Karabulut, 2014. "Power series expansions for the distribution and mean value function of a geometric process with Weibull interarrival times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(8), pages 599-603, December.
    6. Jiang, R., 2008. "A Gamma–normal series truncation approximation for computing the Weibull renewal function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 616-626.
    7. Jiang, R., 2010. "A simple approximation for the renewal function with an increasing failure rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 963-969.
    8. Dijoux, Yann & Fouladirad, Mitra & Nguyen, Dinh Tuan, 2016. "Statistical inference for imperfect maintenance models with missing data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 84-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:7:p:983-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.