IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v133y2015icp22-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions

Author

Listed:
  • Do, Phuc
  • Voisin, Alexandre
  • Levrat, Eric
  • Iung, Benoit

Abstract

This paper deals with a proactive condition-based maintenance (CBM) considering both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions for a deteriorating system. Perfect maintenance actions restore completely the system to the ‘as good as new’ state. Their related cost are however often high. The first objective of the paper is to investigate the impacts of imperfect maintenance actions. In fact, both positive and negative impacts are considered. Positive impact means that the imperfect maintenance cost is usually low. Negative impact implies that (i) the imperfect maintenance restores a system to a state between good-as-new and bad-as-old and (ii) each imperfect preventive action may accelerate the speed of the system׳s deterioration process. The second objective of the paper is to propose an adaptive maintenance policy which can help to select optimally maintenance actions (perfect or imperfect actions), if needed, at each inspection time. Moreover, the time interval between two successive inspection points is determined according to a remaining useful life (RUL) based-inspection policy. To illustrate the use of the proposed maintenance policy, a numerical example finally is introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:133:y:2015:i:c:p:22-32
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.08.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201400204X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.08.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kijima, Masaaki & Morimura, Hidenori & Suzuki, Yasusuke, 1988. "Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 194-203, November.
    2. Castro, I.T., 2009. "A model of imperfect preventive maintenance with dependent failure modes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 217-224, July.
    3. Nicolai, R.P. & Frenk, J.B.G. & Dekker, R., 2007. "Modelling and optimizing imperfect maintenance of coatings on steel structures," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-24, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    5. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    6. Barker, C.T. & Newby, M.J., 2009. "Optimal non-periodic inspection for a multivariate degradation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 33-43.
    7. A Ponchet & M Fouladirad & A Grall, 2011. "Maintenance policy on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system with imperfect improvements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 105-116, June.
    8. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. A Ponchet & M Fouladirad & A Grall, 2011. "Maintenance policy on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system with imperfect improvements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 105-116, June.
    3. Nguyen, Dinh Tuan & Dijoux, Yann & Fouladirad, Mitra, 2017. "Analytical properties of an imperfect repair model and application in preventive maintenance scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 439-453.
    4. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    5. Zhang, Nan & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne, 2018. "Optimal imperfect maintenance cost analysis of a two-component system with failure interactions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 24-34.
    6. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    7. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    8. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    9. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    10. Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Jiang, Tao, 2020. "Dynamic selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems over a finite horizon: A deep reinforcement learning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 166-181.
    11. W Zhu & M Fouladirad & C Bérenguer, 2015. "Bi-criteria maintenance policies for a system subject to competing wear and δ-shock failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 485-500, December.
    12. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    13. Sergey S. Ketkov & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Lisa M. Maillart, 2023. "Planning of life-depleting preventive maintenance activities with replacements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1461-1483, May.
    14. Ait Mokhtar, El Hassene & Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance modeling and assessment of repairable multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Liu, Xingheng & Vatn, Jørn & Dijoux, Yann & Toftaker, Håkon, 2020. "Unobserved heterogeneity in stable imperfect repair models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    18. Laurent Doyen, 2010. "Asymptotic properties of imperfect repair models and estimation of repair efficiency," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 296-307, April.
    19. Guo, Chiming & Wang, Wenbin & Guo, Bo & Si, Xiaosheng, 2013. "A maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented systems based on Wiener degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 183-194.
    20. Liu, Qiannan & Ma, Lin & Wang, Naichao & Chen, Ankang & Jiang, Qihang, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance model considering multiple maintenance effects on the dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:133:y:2015:i:c:p:22-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.