IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v107y2012icp214-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the structure of a networked system

Author

Listed:
  • La Rovere, Stefano
  • Vestrucci, Paolo

Abstract

The information coming from the network topology, which does not depend on the failure and repair probabilities of its elements, is useful in the preliminary RAMS (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, Safety) analysis and in the Security assessment of critical infrastructures. We propose an approach to investigate the network structure by ranking its elements through Importance and Sensitivity measures.

Suggested Citation

  • La Rovere, Stefano & Vestrucci, Paolo, 2012. "Investigation of the structure of a networked system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 214-223.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:107:y:2012:i:c:p:214-223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832012001184
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patterson, S.A. & Apostolakis, G.E., 2007. "Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1183-1203.
    2. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 485-495, August.
    3. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    4. Marseguerra, M. & Zio, E. & Podofillini, L., 2005. "First-order differential sensitivity analysis of a nuclear safety system by Monte Carlo simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 162-168.
    5. Zio, Enrico & Piccinelli, Roberta, 2010. "Randomized flow model and centrality measure for electrical power transmission network analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 379-385.
    6. Helton, J.C. & Johnson, J.D. & Sallaberry, C.J. & Storlie, C.B., 2006. "Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1175-1209.
    7. E. Zio, 2007. "From complexity science to reliability efficiency: a new way of looking at complex network systems and critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 488-508.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dunn, Sarah & Wilkinson, Sean, 2017. "Hazard tolerance of spatially distributed complex networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Zhao, Chen & Li, Nan & Fang, Dongping, 2018. "Criticality assessment of urban interdependent lifeline systems using a biased PageRank algorithm and a multilayer weighted directed network model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 100-112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    2. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    3. Cui, Lijie & Lu, Zhenzhou & Wang, Pan & Wang, Weihu, 2014. "The ordering importance measure of random variable and its estimation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 132-143.
    4. Penttinen, Jussi-Pekka & Niemi, Arto & Gutleber, Johannes & Koskinen, Kari T. & Coatanéa, Eric & Laitinen, Jouko, 2019. "An open modelling approach for availability and reliability of systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 387-399.
    5. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R., 2012. "Analyzing the topological, electrical and reliability characteristics of a power transmission system for identifying its critical elements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 67-74.
    6. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    7. Do Van, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2010. "From differential to difference importance measures for Markov reliability models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 513-521, August.
    8. Zio, Enrico & Piccinelli, Roberta & Delfanti, Maurizio & Olivieri, Valeria & Pozzi, Mauro, 2012. "Application of the load flow and random flow models for the analysis of power transmission networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 102-109.
    9. Awad, Majdi & Senga Kiesse, Tristan & Assaghir, Zainab & Ventura, Anne, 2019. "Convergence of sensitivity analysis methods for evaluating combined influences of model inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 109-122.
    10. Bukowski, L., 2016. "System of systems dependability – Theoretical models and applications examples," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 76-92.
    11. Bompard, E. & Napoli, R. & Xue, F., 2009. "Assessment of information impacts in power system security against malicious attacks in a general framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1087-1094.
    12. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Xie, Min & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Generalized moment-independent importance measures based on Minkowski distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 449-455.
    13. Daneshkhah, Alireza & Bedford, Tim, 2013. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 82-93.
    14. Fang, Yiping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2017. "Optimizing power system investments and resilience against attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 161-173.
    15. Helton, Jon C., 2011. "Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Conceptual and computational basis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 976-1013.
    16. Aven, Terje & Zio, Enrico, 2011. "Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 64-74.
    17. Yuan, Wei & Zhao, Long & Zeng, Bo, 2014. "Optimal power grid protection through a defender–attacker–defender model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 83-89.
    18. Zohre Alipour & Mohammad Ali Saniee Monfared & Enrico Zio, 2014. "Comparing topological and reliability-based vulnerability analysis of Iran power transmission network," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 139-151, April.
    19. Utne, I.B. & Hokstad, P. & Vatn, J., 2011. "A method for risk modeling of interdependencies in critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 671-678.
    20. Ding, Tao & Yao, Li & Li, Fangxing, 2018. "A multi-uncertainty-set based two-stage robust optimization to defender–attacker–defender model for power system protection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 179-186.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:107:y:2012:i:c:p:214-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.