IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v384y2007i2p165-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effects

Author

Listed:
  • Dubey, Ritesh Kumar
  • Menon, V.J.
  • Mishra, M.
  • Tripathi, D.N.

Abstract

We revisit the well-known topics of self- and induced-screening in an otherwise isotropic neutral plasma/colloid. It is pointed out that the standard Debye–Hückel (DH) theory (ignoring finite size effects) suffers from many ambiguities related to net ionic numbers, total charge of the system, role of the electrostatic Gauss law, short-distance behaviour of the potential and incorrectly normalized pair correlation functions. We give a new formulation (incorporating finite size effects) such that ionic numbers are maintained, the total charge of the system has physically correct value, the Gauss law boundary conditions are rigorously obeyed, short-distance behaviour of the potential is guaranteed automatically, and correlation functions are correctly normalized. Numerical differences between the two approaches show up if the screening length μ−1 becomes comparable to the size R of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Dubey, Ritesh Kumar & Menon, V.J. & Mishra, M. & Tripathi, D.N., 2007. "Debye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effects," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 165-181.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:384:y:2007:i:2:p:165-181
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.06.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710700622X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2007.06.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:384:y:2007:i:2:p:165-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.