IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v364y2006icp537-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete simulation of the dynamics of spread of extreme opinions in a society

Author

Listed:
  • Stauffer, Dietrich
  • Sahimi, Muhammad

Abstract

We propose a discrete model for how opinions about a given “extreme” subject, about which various groups of a population have different degrees of enthusiasm for or susceptibility to, such as fanaticism, extreme social and political positions, and terrorism, may spread. The model, in a certain limit, is the discrete analogue of a deterministic continuum model suggested by others. We carry out extensive computer simulation of the model by utilizing it on lattices with infinite- or short-range interactions, and on symmetric and hierarchical (or directed) Barabási–Albert scale-free networks. Several interesting features of the model are demonstrated, and comparison is made with the deterministic continuum model.

Suggested Citation

  • Stauffer, Dietrich & Sahimi, Muhammad, 2006. "Discrete simulation of the dynamics of spread of extreme opinions in a society," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 364(C), pages 537-543.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:364:y:2006:i:c:p:537-543
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.08.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437105008769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2005.08.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine Billot, 2007. "Social consistency and individual rationality," PSE Working Papers halshs-00588078, HAL.
    2. Rainer Hegselmann & Stefan König & Sascha Kurz & Christoph Niemann & Jörg Rambau, 2015. "Optimal Opinion Control: The Campaign Problem," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18.
    3. Antoine Billot, 2011. "Are Choice Rationality and Social Consistency Two Sides of a Same Coin?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-254, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:364:y:2006:i:c:p:537-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.