IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v117y2022icp47-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational form and excess burden of taxation in a multiproduct mixed oligopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Kangsik

Abstract

We incorporate the excess burden of taxation into a multiproduct mixed oligopoly to analyze the endogenous choice of organizational forms between the multidivisional form (M-form) for divisional incentives and the unitary form (U-form) for corporate incentives. The M-form (U-form) in the managerial delegation for public and private firms is a dominant strategy if the degree of the excess burden of taxation is low (high). Furthermore, asymmetric organizational forms exist in the intermediate range. In a symmetric equilibrium under a mixed duopoly with the M-form, consumer surplus is always greater than that with the U-form, while social welfare crucially depends on whether the excess burden of taxation is higher than a certain threshold. Ultimately, social welfare and consumer surplus are always greater in a mixed duopoly than in privatization. Moreover, extending the analysis of two private firms and one public firm yields (a)symmetric equilibrium in which private firms do not choose the M-form regardless of the degree of the excess burden of taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Kangsik, 2022. "Organizational form and excess burden of taxation in a multiproduct mixed oligopoly," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 47-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:117:y:2022:i:c:p:47-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2021.10.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489622000257
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2021.10.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:117:y:2022:i:c:p:47-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.