IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v175y2020icp96-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The terminal-velocity assumption in simulations of long-range ember transport

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, C.M.
  • Sharples, J.J.
  • Evans, J.P.

Abstract

Ember transport and the subsequent development of spot fires is a significant mode of wildfire spread, particularly in extreme conditions. An important simplifying assumption made in early research into ember transport is the terminal-velocity assumption, in which embers are assumed to always fly at their terminal velocity relative to the wind field. With increases in computational power, it is now possible to directly simulate the atmospheric conditions resulting from wildfires and such simulations can resolve the larger of the turbulent processes involved. Because of the time-scales at which these processes occur, the terminal-velocity assumption may not be justified when modelling ember transport using these simulations. In this study we use a large eddy simulation of a turbulent plume to examine the validity of the terminal-velocity assumption when modelling the long-range transport of non-combusting embers. The results indicate that the use of the terminal-velocity assumption significantly overestimates the density of ember landings at long range, particularly for embers with higher terminal fall speeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, C.M. & Sharples, J.J. & Evans, J.P., 2020. "The terminal-velocity assumption in simulations of long-range ember transport," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 96-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:175:y:2020:i:c:p:96-107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.08.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037847541930237X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.08.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:175:y:2020:i:c:p:96-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.