IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v5y1981i3p252-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Enterprise: An expendable triumph

Author

Listed:
  • Kirthisingha, P. N.

Abstract

The developing countries scored an outstanding diplomatic success when they secured provisions in the Draft Convention for setting up an organ of the International Authority to engage in commercial activities in the international area. If in negotiations concessions are made to one party in exchange for concessions desired by the other, then these concessions should normally be expected to address the real interests of the parties concerned, especially if concessions involve costs, so that the benefits of mutual concessions would be equal. In the negotiation on the question of the system of exploitation, however, the concession to set up this organ--the Enterprise--was made by the industrial countries even though it did not safeguard or achieve any concrete interest of the developing countries or those of a number of individual developing countries, thus bringing about benefits to them. The industrial countries, because they misjudged the mood of the developing countries, failed to recognize that, though united and eloquent, the mounting pressure for a unitary system of exploitation reflected only the highest common factor for agreement among themselves and not a substantive interest from which a benefit or advantage could be derived. Had they seen that the system of exploitation proposed by developing countries did not reflect or promote any widely shared national or ideological interests, the industrial countries could have avoided the undertaking to set up the Enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirthisingha, P. N., 1981. "The Enterprise: An expendable triumph," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 252-256, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:5:y:1981:i:3:p:252-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308-597X(81)90052-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:5:y:1981:i:3:p:252-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.