IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v24y2000i4p287-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marine transportation of irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium and radioactive wastes: the continuing debate on regulatory measures

Author

Listed:
  • Wonham, J.
  • Davies, C. M.
  • Asimakopoulos, V. G.
  • Tselentis, B. S.

Abstract

The prospect that the maritime transportation of irradiated nuclear fuel (INF), plutonium and radioactive wastes can be expected to continue for the foreseeable future, together with widely expressed concern that an accident may occur to a ship carrying such cargo, has meant that regulatory safeguards have come under intense scrutiny in recent years. The paper describes the actions taken by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) aimed at ensuring the safety of ships engaged in such activity, culminating in the decision of its Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) in May 1999 to make compliance with the INF Code mandatory. In relating the above progress, the paper draws attention to a number of issues raised by Governments in the IMO which have so far gone unaddressed, these issues having also been highlighted in responses to a questionnaire circulated to coastal states. The paper reviews the legal issues associated with the right of emergency access to a foreign port by a ship transporting nuclear materials, the availability of a safe haven being crucial in the event that critical repairs or salvage operations are necessary. Finally, the paper considers whether seabed characteristics should be assessed in determining the routeing of such ships, bearing in mind that ocean floor topography and water depth will be crucial in determining whether recovery of nuclear materials would be practicable in the event of sinking of a ship.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonham, J. & Davies, C. M. & Asimakopoulos, V. G. & Tselentis, B. S., 2000. "Marine transportation of irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium and radioactive wastes: the continuing debate on regulatory measures," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 287-299, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:24:y:2000:i:4:p:287-299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(00)00005-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:24:y:2000:i:4:p:287-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.