IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v72y2018icp161-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mass appraisal of farmland using classical econometrics and spatial modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Uberti, Marlene Salete
  • Antunes, Mauro Antonio Homem
  • Debiasi, Paula
  • Tassinari, Wagner

Abstract

Mass appraisals of properties traditionally use classical linear regression models (CLRMs); however, there has been the need to model the data spatially. Such modeling of the geographic effects has been used mainly in appraisals of urban areas, but the values of the properties in rural areas are also affected by the geographic location. This paper aims to use spatial regression econometric models in a sample of rural properties to elaborate the plan of values for an area of the North Fluminense Region – RJ, Brazil. The proposed methodology is to investigate and model the effects caused by the spatial autocorrelation on the CLRMs, evaluate their performance comparing them with the spatial models and produce the plan of values through ordinary kriging. The utilized sample consisted of 113 observations and 25 samples of verification. The performance of the obtained surfaces of values was evaluated through the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The results showed that the spatial autocorrelation can have its effects controlled by Spatial Regression Models, because the Spatial Error Model (CAR) allowed to model the spatial dependence present in the residuals. Using the metrics of Akaike information criterion (AIC), R2 and likelihood function (LIK), the CAR model showed better fit in comparison to the CLRM. The results showed that the surface generated by the CAR model showed the best performance with the lowest RMSE. The combination of the methodologies of classical and spatial regressions and the use of geostatistical techniques were adequate to elaborate and obtain the plan of values for rural areas, to be used for various purposes, such as taxation, financing, expropriations, indemnities (in case of creation of conservation units or even in environmental disasters), among others.

Suggested Citation

  • Uberti, Marlene Salete & Antunes, Mauro Antonio Homem & Debiasi, Paula & Tassinari, Wagner, 2018. "Mass appraisal of farmland using classical econometrics and spatial modeling," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 161-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:161-170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837716311498
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Salvo, Maria & Capitello, Roberta & Gaudenzi, Barbara & Begalli, Diego, 2019. "Risk management strategies and residual risk perception in the wine industry: A spatial analysis in Northeast Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 47-62.
    2. Qi Jiang & Jizhi Li & Hongyun Si & Yangyue Su, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Agricultural Green Development: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Marques, Felipe César & Telles, Tiago Santos, 2023. "Spatial effects are determinants of agricultural land prices in Brazil," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 61(3), January.
    4. Daikun Wang & Victor Jing Li, 2019. "Mass Appraisal Models of Real Estate in the 21st Century: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Elena Bykowa & Maria Hełdak & Julia Sishchuk, 2020. "Cadastral Land Value Modelling Based on Zoning by Prestige: A Case Study of a Resort Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Bo Zhang & Di Zhang, 2020. "Allocation Efficiency, Influencing Factors and Optimization Path of Rural Land Resources: A Case Study in Fang County of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:161-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.