IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v118y2022ics026483772200165x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rigidity with partial elasticity: Local government adaptation under the centralized land quota system in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Tianxiao
  • Tan, Rong
  • Shu, Xianfan

Abstract

Under the rigid centralized land quota system in China, local governments actively adopt various strategies to achieve economic growth. This paper describes and evaluates a new local decentralized strategy in China called the flexible quota system, which is used to satisfy the land use requirements of key and uncertain projects. Using Zhejiang Province as an example, we find that the innovative aspect of this flexible quota system is that the upper-level government reserves a share of quotas for overall decision-making, and sub-level governments competitively apply for quotas based on project importance. Through the above mechanism, the flexible quota system smoothly guarantees unforeseeable land use arrangements in key projects and improves the overall land quota allocation performance. Furthermore, data from scenario simulations show that compared with the original system, this flexible quota system has a greater net benefit in land development and is almost twice as successful in dealing with land use for uncertain key projects. The paper may provide new knowledge for local innovation in land planning under the traditional centralized system.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Tianxiao & Tan, Rong & Shu, Xianfan, 2022. "Rigidity with partial elasticity: Local government adaptation under the centralized land quota system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:118:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200165x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772200165X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Yan & Huang, Xianjin & Zhong, Taiyang & Chen, Yi & Yang, Hong & Chen, Zhigang & Xu, Guoliang & Niu, Lede & Li, Hehui, 2020. "Can annual land use plan control and regulate construction land growth in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Tan, Rong & Qu, Futian & Heerink, Nico & Mettepenningen, Evy, 2011. "Rural to urban land conversion in China — How large is the over-conversion and what are its welfare implications?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 474-484.
    3. Liu, Tao & Huang, Daquan & Tan, Xin & Kong, Fanhao, 2020. "Planning consistency and implementation in urbanizing China: Comparing urban and land use plans in suburban Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Li, Hongbin & Zhou, Li-An, 2005. "Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(9-10), pages 1743-1762, September.
    5. Bas Waterhout & Frank Othengrafen & Olivier Sykes, 2013. "Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 141-159, February.
    6. Chengri Ding & Erik Lichtenberg, 2011. "Land And Urban Economic Growth In China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 299-317, May.
    7. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Bagchi, Tapan P., 2013. "Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: The VECM approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 139-148.
    8. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    9. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    10. Huang, Zhonghua & Du, Xuejun, 2018. "Holding the market under the stimulus plan: Local government financing vehicles' land purchasing behavior in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 85-100.
    11. Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Yan, Siqi & Guo, Guancheng & Peng, Shangui, 2020. "China’s local governments breaking the land use planning quota: A strategic interaction perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Hui Wang & Ran Tao & Juer Tong, 2009. "Trading Land Development Rights under a Planned Land Use System: The “Zhejiang Model”," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 17(1), pages 66-82, January.
    13. Tianxiao Zhou & Rong Tan & Thomas Sedlin, 2018. "Planning Modes for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects (MTIPs): Comparing China and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Zhou, Lin & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Yang, Linchuan, 2021. "Industrial land supply at different technological intensities and its contribution to economic growth in China: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Fan, Xin & Qiu, Sainan & Sun, Yukun, 2020. "Land finance dependence and urban land marketization in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Wu, Shuping & Yang, Zan, 2020. "Informal government preferences and asymmetric land allocation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Zinan Shao & Tejo Spit & Zhifeng Jin & Martha Bakker & Qun Wu, 2018. "Can the Land Use Master Plan Control Urban Expansion and Protect Farmland in China? A Case Study of Nanjing," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 512-531, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Shilin Li & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land and Its Underlying Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Tianxiao Zhou, 2022. "Central–Local Relations in Land Planning Governance in Contemporary China: A Review from the Structural, Process, and Cultural Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Kun Chen & Yinrong Chen & Min Liu & Yi Chen, 2023. "Research on the Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Influence Path of High-Quality Economic Development from the Perspective of Urban Land Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Fei Bao & Zhenzhi Zhao, 2022. "“Takeover” and “Activation” Effects of National Strategies for Industrial Relocation—Based on the Perspective of Marketisation of Land Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Shangxun Xiong & Hui Wang, 2022. "The Logic of Urban Land System Reform in China—A Policy Analysis Framework Based on Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Shenjie Yang & Lanjiao Wen, 2023. "Regional Heterogeneity in China’s Rural Collectively Owned Commercialized Land Market: An Empirical Analysis from 2015–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gyourko, Joseph & Shen, Yang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Rongjie, 2022. "Land finance in China: Analysis and review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Yan, Siqi & Guo, Guancheng & Peng, Shangui, 2020. "China’s local governments breaking the land use planning quota: A strategic interaction perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Huang, Zhonghua & Du, Xuejun, 2021. "How does high-speed rail affect land value? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Siyu Han & Mengcheng Wang & Qi Liu & Renyang Wang & Guoliang Ou & Lu Zhang, 2022. "The Influence of Land Disposition Derived from Land Finance on Urban Innovation in China: Mechanism Discussion and Empirical Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Tianxiao Zhou, 2022. "Central–Local Relations in Land Planning Governance in Contemporary China: A Review from the Structural, Process, and Cultural Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Zhou, Lin & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Yang, Linchuan, 2021. "Industrial land supply at different technological intensities and its contribution to economic growth in China: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Yu, Qing & Hui, Eddie Chi-Man & Shen, Jianfu, 2023. "Do local governments capitalise on the spillover effect in the housing market? Quasi-experimental evidence from house purchase restrictions in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Huang, Liangxiong & Ma, Minghui & Wang, Xianbin, 2022. "Clan culture and risk-taking of Chinese enterprises," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Tang, Peng & Shi, Xiaoping & Gao, Jinlong & Feng, Shuyi & Qu, Futian, 2019. "Demystifying the key for intoxicating land finance in China: An empirical study through the lens of government expenditure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 302-309.
    12. Pi‐Han Tsai & Chien‐Yu Huang & Tsun‐Feng Chiang, 2020. "Fiscal Expenditure And Industrial Land Price In China: Theory And Evidence," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 593-606, October.
    13. Xu, Feng & Chi, Guangqing & Zhang, Zhexi & Yang, Jianxin, 2023. "How does quality regional growth affect land resources dependence in China? Evidence based on spatial Durbin panel models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Ding, Chengri & Niu, Yi & Lichtenberg, Erik, 2014. "Spending preferences of local officials with off-budget land revenues of Chinese cities," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 265-276.
    15. He, Qingsong & Xu, Min & Xu, Zike & Ye, Yanmei & Shu, Xianfan & Xie, Peng & Wu, Jiayu, 2019. "Promotion incentives, infrastructure construction, and industrial landscapes in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Dong, Yilin, 2016. "A note on geographical constraints and housing markets in China," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 15-21.
    17. Wu, Fulong, 2022. "Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Shenjie Yang & Lanjiao Wen, 2023. "Regional Heterogeneity in China’s Rural Collectively Owned Commercialized Land Market: An Empirical Analysis from 2015–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Lijing Tang & Dongyan Wang, 2018. "Optimization of County-Level Land Resource Allocation through the Improvement of Allocation Efficiency from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Ding, Liang & Huang, Ziqian & Xiao, Chaowei, 2023. "Are human activities consistent with planning? A big data evaluation of master plan implementation in Changchun," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:118:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200165x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.