IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v88y2024ics0301420723012485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring economic development and mineral rents nexus across BRICS nations: Fresh insights from multiple threshold panel analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Sanjeet
  • Bhardwaj, Meenu
  • Mahendru, Mandeep
  • Bansal, Pooja
  • Roszko-Wójtowicz, Elżbieta

Abstract

The nexus between economic development and mineral rent across Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) is empirically tested by using multiple threshold panel analysis. This paper focuses on the association and correlation among Mineral Rents (% of GDP) and Gross Domestic Product per capita along with Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Trade, and Renewable Energy Consumption per Capita, by using the data sets for the period 1994–2021. Dynamic Liner Model and Double Threshold models are used for empirical testing of the above variables. The Dynamic Liner Model identified the positive influence of trade and FDI on mineral rent; and the Double Threshold models identified the negative influence of GDP, trade, and FDI on mineral rent. The findings contribute to the literature about mineral rent and economic growth. Moreover, the findings of this paper help in planning policies and interventions for inclusive and sustainable economic development, GDP enhancement, promotion of trade, and FDI in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) by considering mineral rent management. This paper also recommends considering the mineral rent taxation, mineral royalty, mine-community conflicts, corruption, institutional development, politics, and environmental issues before policy implementation and reforms related to economic development, GDP enhancement, promotion of trade, and FDI in BRICS.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Sanjeet & Bhardwaj, Meenu & Mahendru, Mandeep & Bansal, Pooja & Roszko-Wójtowicz, Elżbieta, 2024. "Exploring economic development and mineral rents nexus across BRICS nations: Fresh insights from multiple threshold panel analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012485
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723012485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.