IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v87y2023ipas0301420723010383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aboriginal employment outcomes at Argyle Diamond Mine: What constitutes success, and for whom?

Author

Listed:
  • Parmenter, Joni
  • Dowell, Kia
  • Holcombe, Sarah
  • Alexander, Rowena

Abstract

Indigenous participation in the Australian mining workforce has rapidly increased over the last 15 years, yet little is known about what outcomes have been achieved for those employed. Using a case study of Rio Tinto's Argyle Diamond Mine in the Kimberley region of Western Australia, this paper begins to explore the extent to which Aboriginal people succeeded in achieving, as articulated in the Indigenous land use agreement, “good careers at the same time as following their culture” (MPA, 2004:101). To consider this issue, we draw on elements of the Yap and Yu (2016, 2016a) Yawuru wellbeing indicators, on the basis that the structures and indicators of wellbeing followed by the Traditional Owners associated with the agreement have not been recorded in the wellbeing scholarship. With the mine closed in late 2020 after almost 40 years, the question of what outcomes Aboriginal employees have achieved is a critical one to consider. Although disaggregating the effects of mining employment from other aspects of the benefit stream within the agreement is not straightforward, a focus on the experiences of those Aboriginal employees at Argyle provides a corrective to the lack of empirical research over the last decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Parmenter, Joni & Dowell, Kia & Holcombe, Sarah & Alexander, Rowena, 2023. "Aboriginal employment outcomes at Argyle Diamond Mine: What constitutes success, and for whom?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:87:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723010383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723010383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:87:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723010383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.