IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v86y2023ipas0301420723010103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural resources governance and geopolitical risks: A literature review and bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Jiangli
  • Wang, Shuo
  • Yang, Wantong

Abstract

Geopolitical risks and natural resources governance have recently become the focus of increasing scholarly attention. To provide a systematic analysis of the literature on this topic, this paper conducts a bibliometric approach and network analysis. Our findings illustrate that the issue of “Geopolitical Risks-Natural Resources Governance” is a cross-disciplinary research area that has received wide-ranging attention from legal, political, economic, geographic, and military disciplines. In addition, previous research paid attention to the discussion of “naturalresources→geopolitical conflicts” before 2015, while scholars have focused on the research of “geopoliticalrisks→naturalresourcesgovernance” after 2015. Furthermore, we predict that scholars will continue focusing on the research of the influence of geopolitical risks on natural resources governance. Finally, we recommend that subsequent studies use regression discontinuity design (RDD) and difference-in-difference (DID) methods to address endogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Jiangli & Wang, Shuo & Yang, Wantong, 2023. "Natural resources governance and geopolitical risks: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:86:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723010103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723010103
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:86:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723010103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.