IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v86y2023ipas0301420723009637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable mining: Examining the direct and configuration path of legitimacy pressure, dual embeddedness resource dependency and green mining towards resource management

Author

Listed:
  • Ampofo, Sandra Asantewa
  • Yunfei, Shao
  • Opoku-Mensah, Evans
  • Effah, Derrick
  • Tuffour, Priscilla
  • Darko, Debora
  • Asiedu-Aryeh, Emelia

Abstract

The mining industries' contribution to economies has been limited to the boomtown's impact of short-term initiatives. However, the bane of mining on resource management has been a recurring theme. This study recognizes the need to investigate the interrelationship among legitimate pressure, resource dependence, and green practices in the quest for sustainable resource management. The study categorized legitimate pressure into three distinct groups (coercive, normative, and mimetic pressure) and resource dependence into intra and inter-organizational resource dependence to assess the interrelationship among these constructs. We use both the structural model and the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach and 320 respondents from the Ghanaian mining industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ampofo, Sandra Asantewa & Yunfei, Shao & Opoku-Mensah, Evans & Effah, Derrick & Tuffour, Priscilla & Darko, Debora & Asiedu-Aryeh, Emelia, 2023. "Sustainable mining: Examining the direct and configuration path of legitimacy pressure, dual embeddedness resource dependency and green mining towards resource management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:86:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723009637
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723009637
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:86:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723009637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.