IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v11y1981i2p260-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Second-order optimality of randomized estimation and test procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Götze, F.

Abstract

Let P([Theta], [tau]) || , [theta] [set membership, variant] [Theta] [subset of] , [tau] [set membership, variant] T [subset of] p denote a family of probability measures, where [tau] denotes the vector of nuisance parameters. Starting from randomized asymptotic maximum likelihood (as. m. l.) estimators for ([theta], [tau]) we construct randomized estimators which are asymptotically median unbiased up to o(n-1/2) resp. test procedures which are as. similar of level [alpha] + o(n-1/2) (for testing [theta] = [theta]0, [tau] [set membership, variant] T against one sided alternatives). The estimation procedures are second-order efficient in the class of estimators which are median unbiased up to o(n-1/2) and the test procedures are second-order efficient in the class of tests which are as. of level [alpha] + o(n-1/2). These results hold without any continuity condition on the family of probability measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Götze, F., 1981. "Second-order optimality of randomized estimation and test procedures," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 260-272, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:11:y:1981:i:2:p:260-272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-259X(81)90113-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:11:y:1981:i:2:p:260-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.