IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jjieco/v40y2016icp1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gatekeeper incentives and demand inducement: An empirical analysis of care managers in the Japanese long-term care insurance program

Author

Listed:
  • Sugawara, Shinya
  • Nakamura, Jiro

Abstract

This study analyzes the incentives and supplier-induced demand of care managers, who are intermediaries between consumers and service providers in the Japanese social insurance program for long-term care. Care managers can be considered as pure gatekeepers, in that their function is limited to referral people to specialists and they themselves do not provide care. Care managers are rewarded by capitation, which is considered as a cost-effective payment mechanism for insurers. However, many care managers actually work for firms that also operate as service providers. Service providers are rewarded by a fee-for-service payment and can have a motivation to induce excess consumer demand. The violation of the neutrality of care managers might result in a financial burden on social insurance. In this study, we empirically test whether there is a positive correlation between care manager density and care costs, which might imply the existence of supplier-induced demand. Our results show a positive correlation, particularly in the case of care managers who work for firms that jointly operate in service provision sectors. Based on these results, we conduct a quantitative analysis, and show that the demand induced by care managers might produce a considerable financial burden on social insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sugawara, Shinya & Nakamura, Jiro, 2016. "Gatekeeper incentives and demand inducement: An empirical analysis of care managers in the Japanese long-term care insurance program," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:40:y:2016:i:c:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2016.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889158316300016
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jjie.2016.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Misook & Song, Hyunjong, 2020. "Disagreement between a public insurer’s recommendation and beneficiary’s choice of long-term care services in Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 881-887.
    2. Sano, Kazuaki & Miyawaki, Atsushi & Abe, Kazuhiro & Jin, Xueying & Watanabe, Taeko & Tamiya, Nanako & Kobayashi, Yasuki, 2022. "Effects of cost sharing on long-term care service utilization among home-dwelling older adults in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1310-1316.
    3. Shinya Sugawara, 2022. "What composes desirable formal at-home elder care? An analysis for multiple service combinations," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 373-402, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Elderly care; Gatekeepers; Incentive; Supplier-induced demand; Japanese long-term care insurance program; Care managers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:40:y:2016:i:c:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622903 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.