IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jimfin/v99y2019ics0261560618301955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is contagion asymmetric during the European sovereign crisis?

Author

Listed:
  • Beltratti, Andrea
  • Stulz, René M.

Abstract

We use shocks to CDS spreads of peripheral countries to identify the effects of changes in the creditworthiness of these countries on stock returns of EU banks. We predict that large positive spread shocks should have a weaker impact in absolute value than large negative shocks because bank equity is an option on the bank’s assets, policy reactions are asymmetric, and bank portfolios include bonds that benefit from a flight to safety. We find support for this prediction during the European crisis, so that contagion from pervasive creditworthiness shocks is asymmetric. This effect is important enough to make the portfolio contagion channel economically and statistically insignificant for adverse shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Beltratti, Andrea & Stulz, René M., 2019. "Why is contagion asymmetric during the European sovereign crisis?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:99:y:2019:i:c:s0261560618301955
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560618301955
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spyros Alogoskoufis & Sam Langfield, 2020. "Regulating the Doom Loop," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 16(4), pages 251-292, September.
    2. Burietz, A. & Ureche-Rangau, L., 2020. "Better the devil you know: Home and sectoral biases in bank lending," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 69-85.
    3. Jiajia, Liu & Kun, Guo & Fangcheng, Tang & Yahan, Wang & Shouyang, Wang, 2023. "The effect of the disposal of non-performing loans on interbank liquidity risk in China: A cash flow network-based analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 105-119.
    4. Markus Vogl, 2022. "Quantitative modelling frontiers: a literature review on the evolution in financial and risk modelling after the financial crisis (2008–2019)," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(12), pages 1-69, December.
    5. Vogl, Markus, 2022. "Controversy in financial chaos research and nonlinear dynamics: A short literature review," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. González-Velasco, Carmen & García-López, Marcos & González-Fernández, Marcos, 2022. "Does sovereign risk impact banking risk in the Eurozone? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    7. Carpinelli, Luisa & Crosignani, Matteo, 2021. "The design and transmission of central bank liquidity provisions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 27-47.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:99:y:2019:i:c:s0261560618301955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30443 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.