IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jebusi/v128y2024ics0148619523000401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SMEs and patents: Is it worth it? A longitudinal analysis of the patent-performance relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Taglialatela, Jonathan
  • Barontini, Roberto

Abstract

In response to scepticism about the benefits of patenting in small firms, this paper provides new evidence on the relationship between financial performance in SMEs and patents, distinguishing between applications and granted patents. Empirical analyses show that firms with a patent application still pending five years after the filing date report higher sales than comparable firms who have not filed. Yet, we also find that the monopoly rights attached to granted patents do not result in higher sales than simply filing for a patent. This analysis leads us to infer that the activities performed during the patent application process improve firm knowledge stocks and absorptive capacity, in turn promoting performance above and beyond the status quo. SME managers should find in this study solid empirical evidence supporting well-informed decision-making over patenting.

Suggested Citation

  • Taglialatela, Jonathan & Barontini, Roberto, 2024. "SMEs and patents: Is it worth it? A longitudinal analysis of the patent-performance relationship," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0148619523000401
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619523000401
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0148619523000401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-economics-and-business .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.