This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Optimal criminal procedure: Fairness and deterrence

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Miceli, Thomas J.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V7M-475SRWS-2/2/8ec3573d5a6e12bac0ce884caf0287f9
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal International Review of Law and Economics.

Volume (Year): 11 (1991)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
Pages: 3-10
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:11:y:1991:i:1:p:3-10

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/irle

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Henrik Lando, 2007. "The Size of the Sanction Should Depend on the Weight of the Evidence," Review of Law & Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 1(2), pages 4. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Thomas J. Miceli, 2006. "Criminal Solicitation, Entrapment, and the Enforcement of Law," Working papers 2006-24, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Erling Eide, . "Recent developments in Economics of Crime," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2004-1-1086, Berkeley Electronic Press. [Downloadable!]
  4. Matteo Rizzolli & Margherita Saraceno, 2009. "Better that X guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer," Working Papers 168, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2009. [Downloadable!]
  5. Hugh Gravelle & Nuno Garoupa, . "Optimal Deterrence with Legal Defence Expenditure," Discussion Papers 00/08, Department of Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Garoupa, Nuno & Stephen, Frank, 2003. "A Note on Optimal Law Enforcement with Legal Aid," CEPR Discussion Papers 4113, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Nuno Garoupa & Fernando Gomez, 2008. "Paying the Price for Being Caught: The Economics of Manifest and Non-Manifest Theft in Roman Law," Review of Law & Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Lando, Henrik, 2000. "The Optimal Standard of Proof in Criminal Law When Both Fairness and Deterrence Matter," Working Papers 2000-7, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Finance. [Downloadable!]
  9. Thomas J. Miceli & Kathleen Segerson, 2004. "Punishing the Innocent along with the Guilty: The Economics of Individual versus Group Punishment," Working papers 2004-37, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Thomas J. Miceli, 2009. "Deterrence and Incapacitation Models of Criminal Punishment: Can the Twain Meet?," Working papers 2009-25, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  11. Eberhard Feess & Gerd Muehlheusser & Ansgar Wohlschlegel, 2009. "Environmental liability under uncertain causation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 133-148, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Thomas J. Miceli, 2004. "Sentencing Guidelines, Judicial Discretion, And Social Values," Working papers 2004-23, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  13. Thomas J. Miceli, 2009. "Deterred or Detained? A Unified Model of Criminal Punishment," Working papers 2009-16, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.