IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfin/v90y2024ics1042443123001543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial market connectedness between the U.S. and China: A new perspective based on non-linear causality networks

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Bin-xia
  • Sun, Yan-lin

Abstract

This paper analyzes the connectedness between the financial markets in the U.S. and China based on non-linear Granger causality and quantile Granger causality networks. We extend the linear Granger causality network proposed by Billio et al. (2012) and support the importance of multi-class market interactions highlighted by Bollerslev et al. (2018). We find that non-linear Granger causality between stock, bond, and foreign exchange markets in the U.S. and China provides more interconnectedness than linear Granger causality. Both the strength and the direction of the connectedness are related to the quantile of market returns, as evidenced by the fact that the left (right) tail quantiles provide more causal effects than the middle quantiles and the mean. We characterize this phenomenon as the “smiling curve” of causality connectedness, and we show the “smiling curve” for each country and financial submarket. Compared to the financial markets in China, those in the U.S. appear to be more central to the connectedness network, with the main route being the stock market. When market returns are in the right tail quantile interval, the U.S. financial market has more capacity to receive information from various markets than China does. When market returns are in the left tail quantile interval and at the middle quantiles, the Chinese financial markets are more susceptible to shocks than those in the United States, with the Chinese stock and bond markets being more sensitive than the foreign exchange market.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Bin-xia & Sun, Yan-lin, 2024. "Financial market connectedness between the U.S. and China: A new perspective based on non-linear causality networks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s1042443123001543
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443123001543
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s1042443123001543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/intfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.