IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfin/v89y2023ics1042443123001531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquidity risk, return performance, and tracking error: Synthetic vs. Physical ETFs

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Jinhwan
  • Cho, Hoon
  • Seok, Sangik

Abstract

As the global ETF market continues to grow, the significance of understanding replication strategies has become increasingly apparent. This study examines the compensation of synthetic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) due to their greater risk exposure than physical ETFs, using ETFs listed on developed European markets from 2009 to 2020. This is the first study to investigate liquidity risk related to the replication strategy of ETFs. We investigate the difference in systematic liquidity risk between synthetic and physical ETFs using a liquidity-adjusted capital asset pricing model (LCAPM). Our findings suggest that synthetic ETFs have higher liquidity risks than physical ETFs and offer additional returns within the low-liquidity group. We also analyze the tracking performance of ETFs based on their type and find that the synthetic replication method reduces tracking errors within the high-liquidity group. Specifically, the enhanced tracking performance of synthetic ETFs becomes more prominent during periods of liquidity shocks than in regular periods. These findings shed light on key considerations for resolving puzzles in tracking errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Jinhwan & Cho, Hoon & Seok, Sangik, 2023. "Liquidity risk, return performance, and tracking error: Synthetic vs. Physical ETFs," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:89:y:2023:i:c:s1042443123001531
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443123001531
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:89:y:2023:i:c:s1042443123001531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/intfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.