IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v74y2019icp25-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male New Zealand robin (Petroica longipes) song repertoire size does not correlate with cognitive performance in the wild

Author

Listed:
  • MacKinlay, Regan D.
  • Shaw, Rachael C.

Abstract

Songbirds (Oscines) possess specialized brain regions responsible for the learning and production of their elaborate vocalizations. It has previously been suggested that song may provide a useful indicator of individual cognitive ability, due to its underlying neurobiology, individual variability, and links to developmental health. To date the relationship between song repertoire and cognitive performance has been most extensively examined in wild song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Two initial studies found that song repertoire size was negatively correlated with spatial memory performance, but positively correlated with inhibitory control performance in a detour reaching task. However, a recent attempt to replicate this research found opposing patterns of association between each of these cognitive measures and song repertoire. It has been suggested that we may gain further insight into the relationship between song learning and other cognitive abilities by investigating species with different ecology to song sparrows, namely caching species. Here we re-examine the relationship between song repertoire size, spatial memory and detour reaching performance in a caching songbird, the toutouwai, or North Island robin (Petroica longipes). We tested both male and female toutouwai in a detour reaching task and a spatial memory task, while also recording the individual song repertoire size for 21 of the males tested. All experiments were carried out in the wild on individuals' territories. We found no associations between song repertoire and performance in either cognitive task, or between the two cognitive task performances. Our results provide further evidence that song repertoire is unlikely to be a useful signal of individual spatial memory and inhibitory control ability in songbirds.

Suggested Citation

  • MacKinlay, Regan D. & Shaw, Rachael C., 2019. "Male New Zealand robin (Petroica longipes) song repertoire size does not correlate with cognitive performance in the wild," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 25-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:25-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.10.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300540
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2018.10.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Morand-Ferron & Ella F. Cole & James E.C. Rawles & John L. Quinn, 2011. "Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1241-1248.
    2. Candy Rowe & Susan D. Healy, 2014. "Measuring variation in cognition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1287-1292.
    3. Jean-Nicolas Audet & Louis Lefebvre, 2017. "What’s flexible in behavioral flexibility?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 943-947.
    4. Tara M. Farrell & Katelyn Weaver & Yong-Seok An & Scott A. MacDougall-Shackleton, 2012. "Song bout length is indicative of spatial learning in European starlings," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 101-111.
    5. Neeltje J. Boogert & Tim W. Fawcett & Louis Lefebvre, 2011. "Mate choice for cognitive traits: a review of the evidence in nonhuman vertebrates," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 447-459.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Thornton & Jess Isden & Joah R. Madden, 2014. "Toward wild psychometrics: linking individual cognitive differences to fitness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1299-1301.
    2. R. Croston & C.L. Branch & D.Y. Kozlovsky & R. Dukas & V.V. Pravosudov, 2015. "Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1447-1459.
    3. Li Li & Cwyn Solvi & Feng Zhang & Zhaoyang Qi & Lars Chittka & Wei Zhao, 2021. "Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Oded Keynan & Amanda R. Ridley & Arnon Lotem, 2015. "Social foraging strategies and acquisition of novel foraging skills in cooperatively breeding Arabian babblers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 207-214.
    5. John L. Quinn & Ella F. Cole & Julie Morand-Ferron, 2014. "Studying microevolutionary processes in cognitive traits: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1297-1298.
    6. Jason Keagy & Jean-François Savard & Gerald Borgia, 2012. "Cognitive ability and the evolution of multiple behavioral display traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 448-456.
    7. Candy Rowe & Susan D. Healy, 2014. "Measuring cognition will be difficult but worth it: a response to comments on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1298-1298.
    8. Niclas Kolm, 2014. "Measuring variation in cognition can be done, but it requires hard empirical work: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1296-1297.
    9. Katarzyna Galasinska & Aleksandra Szymkow, 2021. "The More Fertile, the More Creative: Changes in Women’s Creative Potential across the Ovulatory Cycle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Noa Truskanov & Rimon Shy & Arnon Lotem, 2018. "Context-specific learning and its implications for social learning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1046-1055.
    11. Alex Thornton, 2014. "How and why are some species so smart? A comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1294-1295.
    12. van Horik, Jayden O. & Langley, Ellis J.G. & Whiteside, Mark A. & Madden, Joah R., 2019. "A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:25-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.