IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v62y2022ics0268401221001237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Carter, Lemuria
  • Yoon, Victoria
  • Liu, Dapeng

Abstract

Design science as a research paradigm is gaining popularity in the information systems (IS) discipline. E-government research explores IS artifacts designed to improve the quality and efficiency of public administration and service. This paper utilizes the E-government Design Research Model (EgovDR Model) to review e-government designs. Through a comprehensive literature review, this paper identifies prototypical e-government tasks for design science implementation and the corresponding solutions. We demonstrate whether and how the development and evolution of e-government designs continue to gain relevance in design science research. Additionally, this paper identifies and analyzes the theories employed in the literature to illustrate how the EgovDR Model has facilitated e-government designs in increasing rigor over time. Our findings indicate the majority of the workpractice tasks in existing e-government designs are decision-support tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Carter, Lemuria & Yoon, Victoria & Liu, Dapeng, 2022. "Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:62:y:2022:i:c:s0268401221001237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401221001237
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:62:y:2022:i:c:s0268401221001237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.