IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v49y2019icp316-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconceptualizing information quality as effective use in the context of business intelligence and analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Torres, Russell
  • Sidorova, Anna

Abstract

Despite a significant body of knowledge related to BI&A success, questions remain regarding the mechanism through which BI&A contributes to organizational benefits. In this paper, we build on the representation theory of effective use in order to enrich the current understanding of BI&A success informed by the IS success model. The theoretical model proposed here casts an integrated construct, information-quality-as-effective-use, as the mediator between system quality, data quality, and BI&A personnel expertise and performance benefits. The results of the empirical testing support the propositions of the theoretical model. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Torres, Russell & Sidorova, Anna, 2019. "Reconceptualizing information quality as effective use in the context of business intelligence and analytics," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 316-329.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:49:y:2019:i:c:p:316-329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401218306960
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dalvi-Esfahani, Mohammad & Mosharaf-Dehkordi, Mehdi & Leong, Lam Wai & Ramayah, T. & Jamal Kanaan-Jebna, Abdulkarim M., 2023. "Exploring the drivers of XAI-enhanced clinical decision support systems adoption: Insights from a stimulus-organism-response perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Miguel A. Becerra & Catalina Tobón & Andrés Eduardo Castro-Ospina & Diego H. Peluffo-Ordóñez, 2021. "Information Quality Assessment for Data Fusion Systems," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-30, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:49:y:2019:i:c:p:316-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.