IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v33y2024i2s0969593123001002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) and the social licence to operate of international business: An analysis of controversial cases

Author

Listed:
  • Curran, Louise

Abstract

This paper analyses how the challenging of regulation by multinational enterprises through the investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) process impacts the social licence to operate (SLO) of international business (IB). Drawing on the analyses of controversial ISDS cases, it makes four key contributions. First, it proposes a framework for better understanding SLO and presents strong evidence that the use of ISDS has undermined SLO, not only of the involved companies, but also of IB more widely. Second, it extends the literature on corporate political activity (CPA) by drawing attention to the importance of litigation strategies, largely ignored in prior research. Third, it contributes to the literature on the externalities of CPA by exploring how certain tactics can undermine public trust and SLO. Last, it expands our understanding of the ‘dark side’ of CPA beyond illegal activities and government capture, to ethically questionable strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Curran, Louise, 2024. "Investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) and the social licence to operate of international business: An analysis of controversial cases," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:33:y:2024:i:2:s0969593123001002
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593123001002
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:33:y:2024:i:2:s0969593123001002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.