IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v90y2009i2-3p262-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatisation of health care in Slovenia in the period 1992-2008

Author

Listed:
  • Albreht, Tit
  • Klazinga, Niek

Abstract

Objectives To discuss the background, nature and facilitating and hindering factors of the privatisation process in health care in Slovenia.Methods Descriptive analyses of legal and policy documents mapping the situation in Slovenia against an internationally established taxonomy and typology. Description of the scope and volume of the different types of privatisation.Results Determined by the political will, privatisation in health care in Slovenia has been a gradual process. In 2008, it applies to 30% of the primary care providers (GPs, paediatricians and school medicine doctors), almost 60% of providers in dentistry and about 20% of providers of outpatient specialist care. In the hospital setting, privatisation remained limited and there have not been significant private investments in health infrastructure. Privatisation of health insurance (including insurance to cover co-payments) has steeply risen to 15% of the total health expenditure (THE), while out-of-pocket payments reached 12% of the THE.Conclusions Slovenia's privatisation in health care is focused on primary health care and on health expenditures. Controversies over its extent kept privatisation contained and controlled. Today's share of private provision of health services remains at the conservative end of the European Union. Private expenditures for health services increased considerably, while privatisation of health infrastructure and management has so far been limited. Concerns about the future course of privatisation relate to the issues of equity, fairness and solidarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Albreht, Tit & Klazinga, Niek, 2009. "Privatisation of health care in Slovenia in the period 1992-2008," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 262-269, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:90:y:2009:i:2-3:p:262-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00229-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Böhm, Katharina & Schmid, Achim & Götze, Ralf & Landwehr, Claudia & Rothgang, Heinz, 2013. "Five types of OECD healthcare systems: Empirical results of a deductive classification," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 258-269.
    2. Böhm, Katharina & Schmid, Achim & Götze, Ralf & Landwehr, Claudia & Rothgang, Heinz, 2012. "Classifying OECD healthcare systems: A deductive approach," TranState Working Papers 165, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:90:y:2009:i:2-3:p:262-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.