IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v89y2009i1p124-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General practitioners' workload associated to practice size rather than chronic care organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Wensing, Michel
  • Van den Hombergh, Pieter
  • Van Doremalen, Jan
  • Grol, Richard
  • Szecsenyi, Joachim

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to explore the associations between chronic care organisation and physician workload in primary care.Design Secondary analysis of observational data.Setting and participants One hundred and forty general practices from 10 European countries.Mean outcome measures The Chronic Care Model was used to specify measures for chronic care organisation in the practice. Practice size was operationalised as the number of yearly attending patients in the practice and physician workload as the mean number of physician working hours per 1000 yearly attending patients. Mixed linear regression analysis models were used.Results Some aspects of chronic care organisation seemed to be associated with physician workload. After controlling for practice size and non-physician staff, none of these effects remained significant. Physicians worked, on average, 1.29Â h less per week for each additional 1000 patients yearly attending the practice. Each additional 0.1 full time equivalent assistance in the practice was associated with an increase of 1.6 physician working hours per week per 1000 patients.Conclusions Practice size rather than chronic care organisation determined physician workload. Larger practices might use physicians' time more efficiently compared to small practices, but reduced quality of care in larger practices could be an alternative interpretation of the findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wensing, Michel & Van den Hombergh, Pieter & Van Doremalen, Jan & Grol, Richard & Szecsenyi, Joachim, 2009. "General practitioners' workload associated to practice size rather than chronic care organisation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 124-129, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:89:y:2009:i:1:p:124-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00129-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wensing, Michel & van den Hombergh, Pieter & Akkermans, Reinier & van Doremalen, Jan & Grol, Richard, 2006. "Physician workload in primary care: What is the optimal size of practices?: A cross-sectional study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 260-267, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaal, Sander & van den Hombergh, Pieter & Verstappen, Wim & Wensing, Michel, 2010. "Patient safety features are more present in larger primary care practices," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 87-91, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Olsen & Dorte Gyrd-Hansen & Torben Sørensen & Troels Kristensen & Peter Vedsted & Andrew Street, 2013. "Organisational determinants of production and efficiency in general practice: a population-based study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(2), pages 267-276, April.
    2. Esther Van Poel & Claire Collins & Peter Groenewegen & Peter Spreeuwenberg & Gazmend Bojaj & Jonila Gabrani & Christian Mallen & Liubove Murauskiene & Milena Šantrić Milićević & Emmily Schaubroeck & S, 2023. "The Organization of Outreach Work for Vulnerable Patients in General Practice during COVID-19: Results from the Cross-Sectional PRICOV-19 Study in 38 Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Damiani, Gianfranco & Silvestrini, Giulia & Federico, Bruno & Cosentino, Mimma & Marvulli, Mariagrazia & Tirabassi, Federico & Ricciardi, Walter, 2013. "A systematic review on the effectiveness of group versus single-handed practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 180-187.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:89:y:2009:i:1:p:124-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.