IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v137y2023ics0168851023001811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy stringency and the spread of COVID-19: The moderating role of culture and its implications on first responses

Author

Listed:
  • Tu, Ke
  • Chen, Shirley
  • Mesler, Rhiannon MacDonnell

Abstract

There has been a noticeable variance between countries in the growth rate of COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic. Researchers attempted to understand this variance from two primary perspectives: the policies implemented to curb the spread of the virus [1] and the cross-country cultural differences [2]. However, little research to date has looked at the joint effects of policy responses and national culture. We argue that the effectiveness of restrictive policies depends on cultural values. Specifically, when policies are non-mandatary, cultural values influence people's voluntary adherence to these policies, and hence, the spread of COVID-19. We analyzed the growth data in daily new cases across 78 countries, focusing on the joint impact of containment policies and cultural values. We found that although policy responses (i.e., containment policies) significantly predicted the spread rate of COVID-19 over time, their effects were moderated by cultural variables as well. Implications for policymaking are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tu, Ke & Chen, Shirley & Mesler, Rhiannon MacDonnell, 2023. "Policy stringency and the spread of COVID-19: The moderating role of culture and its implications on first responses," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:137:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023001811
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851023001811
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:137:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023001811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.