IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v132y2023ics0168851023000817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction of miscarriage bereavement leave in New Zealand in 2021: A comparison with international experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Hodson, Dr Nathan
  • Jerram, Ray

Abstract

In early 2021, the New Zealand Parliament introduced miscarriage bereavement leave prompting global debate about creating a right to paid time off work for people bereaved through pregnancy loss. Construing such time off as bereavement leave, rather than sick leave or maternity leave, acknowledges the profound significance of the event, but there is limited evidence on whether leave improves mental or physical health outcomes. In this paper we compare four countries with some form of specific bereavement leave for pregnancy losses: New Zealand, United Kingdom, India, and the Phillippines. We also examine an ongoing effort to introduce a similar policy in the USA and the employer-led approach advocated by others. Comparisons are made relating to when during pregnancy leave is available, how much leave is available, how accessible the leave is, what proof of pregnancy loss is required, and who is covered. We conclude by suggesting policy-makers consider a stepped model where there are greater protections for later pregnancy losses and advise advocates to aim to link pregnancy loss bereavement with bereavement leave for other losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Hodson, Dr Nathan & Jerram, Ray, 2023. "Introduction of miscarriage bereavement leave in New Zealand in 2021: A comparison with international experiences," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023000817
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851023000817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023000817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.