IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v119y2015i8p1017-1022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing cross-sectoral quality assurance for cataract surgery in the statutory quality assurance program of the German health care system: Experiences and lessons learned

Author

Listed:
  • Bramesfeld, Anke
  • Pauletzki, Jürgen
  • Behrenz, Lars
  • Szecsenyi, Joachim
  • Willms, Gerald
  • Broge, Björn

Abstract

Since 2001, statutory external quality assurance (QA) for hospital care has been in place in the German health system. In 2009, the decision was taken to expand it to cross-sectoral procedures. This novel and unprecedented form of national QA aims at (1) making the quality procedures comparable that are provided both in inpatient and outpatient care, (2) following-up outcomes of hospital care after patients’ discharge and (3) measuring the quality of complex treatment chains across interfaces. As a pioneer procedure a QA procedure in cataract surgery QA was developed. Using this as an example, challenges of cross-sectoral QA are highlighted. These challenges relate, in particular, to three technical problems: triggering cases for documentation, following-up patients’ after hospital discharge, and the burden of documentation in outpatient care. These problems resulted finally in the haltering of the development of the QA procedure. However, the experiences gained with this first development of cross-sectoral QA inspired the reorientation and further development of the field in Germany. Future cross-sectoral QA will rigorously aim at keeping burden of documentation small. It will draw data for QA mainly at three sources: routine data, patient surveys and peer reviews using indicators. Policy implications of this reorientation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bramesfeld, Anke & Pauletzki, Jürgen & Behrenz, Lars & Szecsenyi, Joachim & Willms, Gerald & Broge, Björn, 2015. "Developing cross-sectoral quality assurance for cataract surgery in the statutory quality assurance program of the German health care system: Experiences and lessons learned," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 1017-1022.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:8:p:1017-1022
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851015000913
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bramesfeld, Anke & Amaddeo, Francesco & Caldas-de-Almeida, José & Cardoso, Graça & Depaigne-Loth, Anne & Derenne, Rose & Donisi, Valeria & Jørgensen, Mette & Lindelius, Birgitta & Lora, Antonio & Main, 2016. "Monitoring mental healthcare on a system level: Country profiles and status from EU countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 706-717.
    2. Bramesfeld, Anke & Wensing, Michel & Bartels, Paul & Bobzin, Henning & Grenier, Catherine & Heugren, Mona & Hirschfield, Dena Jaffe & Langenegger, Manfred & Lindelius, Birgitta & Lucet, Bruno & Manor,, 2016. "Mandatory national quality improvement systems using indicators: An initial assessment in Europe and Israel," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1256-1269.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:8:p:1017-1022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.