IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v100y2011i2-3p290-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating drowning deaths in Northern Iran using capture-recapture method

Author

Listed:
  • Kiakalayeh, Ali Davoudi
  • Mohammadi, Reza
  • Stark Ekman, Diana
  • Yousefzade-Chabok, Shahrokh
  • Behboudi, Firoz
  • Jansson, Bjarne

Abstract

Background Descriptive epidemiological study has shown that drowning is a problem health in low and middle income countries. To analyze records of drowning deaths from two injury registry systems, to ascertain a true estimate of drowning-mortality, it can help to follow up drowning prevention policy.Methods This study uses capture-recapture methods to arrive at a more accurate estimate of the number of drowning events occurring over a one-year period in Guilan and Mazandran Provinces, in northern Iran. Records from the Iran's Forensic Medical System and Death Registry System were compared, using five matching approaches based on various combinations of the following variables: gender, place of drowning, date of death, victim age, name, region of residence, and/or place of residence.Results The results revealed that the estimated number of drowning cases in the study population is much higher than official figures, ranging from 5.26 to 8.25 per 100,000 residents compared to the national figure of 4.5 per 100,000. The completeness of Death Registry System records for drowning was 70% of corrected estimates while the completeness of records from Forensic Medicine was 54.4%.Conclusion We conclude that the use of capture-recapture methodology may provide better accuracy in measuring drowning events. This method may also help reduce bias in the estimate of incidence rates and comparison of different populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiakalayeh, Ali Davoudi & Mohammadi, Reza & Stark Ekman, Diana & Yousefzade-Chabok, Shahrokh & Behboudi, Firoz & Jansson, Bjarne, 2011. "Estimating drowning deaths in Northern Iran using capture-recapture method," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(2-3), pages 290-296, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:100:y:2011:i:2-3:p:290-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(10)00266-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:100:y:2011:i:2-3:p:290-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.