IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v60y2024ics1044028324000176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the black box of sentiment and cryptocurrency: What, which, why, when and how?

Author

Listed:
  • Bennett, Donyetta
  • Mekelburg, Erik
  • Strauss, Jack
  • Williams, T.H.

Abstract

We evaluate the impact of a large set of daily sentiment measures for predicting Ethereum (ETH) returns using Machine Learning (ML) methods. We examine ETH predictability and evaluate 5 W's: What, Which, When, Why, and hoW. What ML methods work best? Which variables robustly predict ETH returns? When and why does predictability occur? And how can we improve predictability? We extract information from fifty sentiment measures from Refinitiv's MarketPsych Analytics using ML methods including Lasso, Elastic Net, Principal Components, Partial Least Squares, Neural Net and Random Forest. We then apply an ensemble procedure that exponentially weights forecasts from these traditional ML methods based on recent MSFE criteria. By discounting past model performance, our ensemble procedure accommodates time variation in model selection and generates investment gains and significant out-of-sample pre- dictability. Our study offers practical implications for investing in ETH, including considering an array of sentiment measures, diversifying your model forecasts using an ensemble approach, and the importance of transaction costs in trading simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennett, Donyetta & Mekelburg, Erik & Strauss, Jack & Williams, T.H., 2024. "Unlocking the black box of sentiment and cryptocurrency: What, which, why, when and how?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:60:y:2024:i:c:s1044028324000176
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000176
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:60:y:2024:i:c:s1044028324000176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.