IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v160y2024ics1389934124000078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The discount rate differential required for harvesting-by-dice-rolling to outperform optimal rotation planning

Author

Listed:
  • Foppert, John D.

Abstract

Although the cost of capital has enormous bearing on the financial performance of forestry investment projects, the dynamics of this factor of production are under-theorized in modern forest economic thought and its potential susceptibility to management is under-analyzed by forest managers, investors, and scholars. This study illustrates the importance of the cost of capital relative to the choice of rotation age by modeling the discount rate differential required for fully randomized harvesting strategies to yield the same expected capitalized returns as optimal rotation planning. For numerical simulations of radiata pine plantations in New Zealand and benchmark discount rates between 1% and 10%, a crude dice-rolling strategy required discount rate concessions from 0.31 to 3.35 percentage points to match the performance of optimal rotations. “Optimal” random harvesting strategies—with stochastic harvest probabilities specified to maximize expected value—required discount rate concessions lower than one percentage point across the entire range of benchmark rates. This paper concludes with an exploration of potential mechanisms through which the cost of capital could be endogenized in forest economic analysis and practical investment management.

Suggested Citation

  • Foppert, John D., 2024. "The discount rate differential required for harvesting-by-dice-rolling to outperform optimal rotation planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.