IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v156y2023ics1389934123001521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of carbon price on the relative profitability of production forestry and permanent forestry for New Zealand plantations

Author

Listed:
  • Manley, Bruce

Abstract

New Zealand has an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) under which forest growers can earn carbon units for increases in carbon stock. Between March 2020 and March 2022 carbon price increased from $24/NZU to $74/NZU. Carbon price increased to the extent that the Land Expectation Value (LEV) of permanent forestry (without clearfelling) exceeds the LEV of production forestry (with clearfelling) on many sites. This paper reports on an analysis comparing the LEV of permanent forestry with the LEV of production forestry for land of different site productivity, harvest difficulty (i.e. slope) and location (i.e. distance to market). Breakeven carbon price (when LEV for permanent forestry equals LEV for production forestry) is calculated for each combination to reveal overall trends. The effect of carbon price on the proportion of national afforestation for which permanent forestry gives a higher LEV is estimated. Results indicate that, at a carbon price of $50/NZU, permanent forestry is more profitable than production forestry on 71% of area with measured carbon and 26% of area with look-up table carbon. When carbon price reaches $100/NZU, permanent forestry is more profitable for all area.

Suggested Citation

  • Manley, Bruce, 2023. "Impact of carbon price on the relative profitability of production forestry and permanent forestry for New Zealand plantations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:156:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123001521
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934123001521
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:156:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123001521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.