IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v60y2024ics1544612323012540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shedding light on the relationship between ESG ratings and systematic risk

Author

Listed:
  • Pistolesi, Francesco
  • Teti, Emanuele

Abstract

The role of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors is growing in importance in finance studies. However, the relationship of this role with systematic risk is largely controversial and underinvestigated. We study this relationship considering a 17-year time span from 2005 to 2021 using a sample of all active constituent companies of the NYSE, with a final dataset of 791 firms for a total of 7,177 firm-year observations. The findings indicate that the relationship between overall ESG score and systematic risk takes an inverted U-shape. These results are solid considering ESG components at both an aggregate and disaggregate level. When companies invest little in ESG, they could be viewed as having more funds to allocate in, presumably, more rewarding projects and are more flexible and less risky, at least in the short term. However, beyond a certain threshold, more attention to sustainability facets results in lower systematic risk. These findings are also supported by checking them through different robustness tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Pistolesi, Francesco & Teti, Emanuele, 2024. "Shedding light on the relationship between ESG ratings and systematic risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:60:y:2024:i:c:s1544612323012540
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612323012540
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:60:y:2024:i:c:s1544612323012540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.