IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v91y2024ics1057521923005100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventive regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China Securities Regulatory Commission's random inspections

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xingquan
  • Zhao, Rui
  • Yang, Zheng

Abstract

This study takes CSRC's (China Securities Regulatory Commission) random inspection as a quasi-natural experiment, employs a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2007 to 2021, and tests the impact of a preventive regulation on firms' financialization using a difference-in-differences model (DID). We found that CSRC's random inspection significantly reduces the financialization of entity enterprises, especially over financialization. The mechanism test shows that random inspection can reduce the firms' financialization through two paths: the resource effect, which alleviate financing constraints, and the governance effect, which restrain agency costs and earnings management. Further analysis shows that the mitigating role of the CSRC's random inspection is especially prominent for enterprises faced with more efficient securities regulation, more serious media pressure or executives lack of financial background. Moreover, the CSRC's random inspection have a regional spillover effect. In the economic consequences test, we found that firms' financialization reduces long-term value-creating activities such as R&D investment, innovation output and main business performance, while CSRC's random inspection mitigate such adverse effects. These findings enrich not only the research related to financialization in emerging economies, but also provide meaningful implications for the current securities regulatory system reform in China and other countries in which have implemented or are going to implement the preventive regulatory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xingquan & Zhao, Rui & Yang, Zheng, 2024. "Preventive regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China Securities Regulatory Commission's random inspections," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923005100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923005100
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Random inspection; Financialization; Resource effect; Governance effect;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923005100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.