IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v90y2023ics1057521923003599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does geopolitical risk affect firms' idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Xiaohang
  • Cao, Yuxuan
  • Liu, Pei Jose
  • Han, Dun

Abstract

Using 2663 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2003 to 2019, we investigate the relationship between geopolitical risk (GPR) and firm idiosyncratic volatility through panel fixed effects and attempt to explain the mechanism. The main findings are presented as follows. First, GPR can explain the change of firms' idiosyncratic volatility. Different industry conditions and ownerships have heterogeneous effects on the firms' idiosyncratic volatilities. In addition, the interaction terms of ownership concentration, competitive intensity and operating leverage with GPR are statistically significant, and they interact with GPR to affect firms' idiosyncratic volatility. After we conduct a series of robustness tests using methods such as instrumental variables, we innovatively introduce the South China Sea dispute as an external event and use the DID (Difference-in-difference) model to analyze the impact of geopolitical events on corporate risk-taking, our findings remain valid. Our research contributes to a better understanding of geopolitical risk and firms' idiosyncratic volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Xiaohang & Cao, Yuxuan & Liu, Pei Jose & Han, Dun, 2023. "Does geopolitical risk affect firms' idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923003599
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923003599
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923003599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.