IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v15y1997i3p297-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strategic development of manufacturing: Market analysis for investment priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Hill, Terry
  • Westbrook, Roy

Abstract

The UK government promoted a 'manufacturing, planning and implementation' (MPI) scheme between 1991 and 1994. Its aim was to support the strategic development of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) in participating companies. For such AMT developments to be strategic required the companies first to undertake a market review to establish what precisely was required to win orders in its target markets. Consultants hired by companies under the scheme were required therefore to conduct an analysis of market needs sufficiently thorough to permit the appropriate manufacturing developments to be made. This article by Terry Hill and Roy Westbrook examines seven such projects, and demonstrates various types of weakness in the method and outcomes of these market analyses. The methods include customer surveys, internal surveys, SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analyses, and broad reviews. These are shown to have been conducted in such a way that only general statements, rather than indepth analysis, are produced. The weaknesses of these statements are analysed in terms of coverage, verification, segmentation, and definition. It is suggested that a good market analysis must employ a rigorous approach using multiple methods to eliminate these four types of error.

Suggested Citation

  • Hill, Terry & Westbrook, Roy, 1997. "The strategic development of manufacturing: Market analysis for investment priorities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 297-302, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:297-302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237397000091
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kajanus, Miika & Leskinen, Pekka & Kurttila, Mikko & Kangas, Jyrki, 2012. "Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis—Lessons learnt in strategic natural resources management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 1-9.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:297-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.