IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v76y2017icp23-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s the problem in adaptation pathways planning? The potential of a diagnostic problem-structuring approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bosomworth, Karyn
  • Leith, Peat
  • Harwood, Andrew
  • Wallis, Phillip J.

Abstract

Adaptation Pathways (AP) is receiving increased theoretical and practical interest as an approach to planning for climate change that engages with conditions of uncertainty. Participatory action research with environmental and natural resource management (NRM) planners, revealed that the contested, complex nature of NRM challenges the ready utility of AP planning implied by many other published examples. Findings indicate this is because current AP approaches do not yet engage with contested goals and knowledge, and tend to assume that actions to achieve goals are largely technical and unproblematic. Drawing on these findings, this paper develops an argument for a diagnostic, problem-structuring approach as one way of improving the utility of AP planning in contested, complex problems. We posit this approach could help guide selection of ‘fit-for-problem’ analysis and planning methods to develop practicable AP plans that support efforts towards transformational adaptation. Issues of engaging with diverse problem frames, scientific contestations, and institutional dimensions of governance remain potentially fruitful research foci in AP planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Bosomworth, Karyn & Leith, Peat & Harwood, Andrew & Wallis, Phillip J., 2017. "What’s the problem in adaptation pathways planning? The potential of a diagnostic problem-structuring approach," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 23-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:23-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117300254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoffer Carstens & Karin Mossberg Sonnek & Riitta Räty & Per Wikman-Svahn & Annika Carlsson-Kanyama & Jonathan Metzger, 2019. "Insights from Testing a Modified Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways Approach for Spatial Planning at the Municipal Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Nisrine Makhoul & Dimitra V. Achillopoulou & Nikoleta K. Stamataki & Rolands Kromanis, 2023. "Adaptive Pathways Using Emerging Technologies: Applications for Critical Transportation Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-31, November.
    3. Vizinho, André & Avelar, David & Fonseca, Ana Lúcia & Carvalho, Silvia & Sucena-Paiva, Leonor & Pinho, Pedro & Nunes, Alice & Branquinho, Cristina & Vasconcelos, Ana Cátia & Santos, Filipe Duarte & Ro, 2021. "Framing the application of Adaptation Pathways for agroforestry in Mediterranean drylands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Jean P. Palutikof & Roger B. Street & Edward P. Gardiner, 2019. "Decision support platforms for climate change adaptation: an overview and introduction," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 459-476, April.
    5. Hugo Herrera & Birgit Kopainsky, 2020. "Using system dynamics to support a participatory assessment of resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 342-355, September.
    6. Andrea Grant & Ray Ison & Robert Faggian & Victor Sposito, 2019. "Enabling Political Legitimacy and Conceptual Integration for Climate Change Adaptation Research within an Agricultural Bureaucracy: a Systemic Inquiry," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 573-600, October.
    7. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Lamonaca, Emilia & Tappi, Marco & Di Gioia, Leonardo, 2020. "On the Environmental Impacts of Voluntary Animal-based Policies in the EU: Technical and Political Considerations," MPRA Paper 99932, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hyun Kim & David W. Marcouiller & Kyle Maurice Woosnam, 2021. "Multilevel Climate Governance, Anticipatory Adaptation, and the Vulnerability‐Readiness Nexus," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(2), pages 222-242, March.
    9. Fahim Nawroz Tonmoy & David Rissik & J. P. Palutikof, 2019. "A three-tier risk assessment process for climate change adaptation at a local scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 539-557, April.
    10. Mikael Granberg & Karyn Bosomworth & Susie Moloney & Ann-Catrin Kristianssen & Hartmut Fünfgeld, 2019. "Can Regional-Scale Governance and Planning Support Transformative Adaptation? A Study of Two Places," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:23-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.