IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v76y2017icp1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated water resources management: Are river basin committees in Brazil enabling effective stakeholder interaction?

Author

Listed:
  • Barbosa, Marina Costa
  • Mushtaq, Shahbaz
  • Alam, Khorshed

Abstract

Adequate stakeholder involvement and interactions are essential for effective Integrated Water Resources Management. In Brazil, the decision-making process was decentralized at the river basin committee level, which compromises both government and non-government representatives. However, until now Brazil has struggled to effectively implement IWRM. This paper analyses stakeholders’ perspective regarding the water policy and explores their interactions in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Using a mixed- methods approach, combining the stakeholder and complexity theories, an exploratory case study was conducted. Data was obtained via an online survey of 206 participants. Results identified different levels of interactions, where stakeholders from the water sector demonstrated higher levels of interactions compared to institutions from other sectors (e.g., environment, energy,) and from the local levels (e.g., city council). Results also indicated the importance of the river basin committees, as they were considered to propitiate adequate participation. They are, however, not enabling adequate interactions. This is because a significant number of stakeholders still do not have formal ways of interaction in their institutions. The analysis led to a set of recommendations to improve water sector stakeholder’s interactions, including interaction with stakeholders outside the water sector. This was considered a key way to seek integration, and, most importantly, to enhance water policy implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbosa, Marina Costa & Mushtaq, Shahbaz & Alam, Khorshed, 2017. "Integrated water resources management: Are river basin committees in Brazil enabling effective stakeholder interaction?," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901116302477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.