IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v315y2024i2p777-785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repositioning with unreliable carriers: The case of marine chassis equipment at container ports

Author

Listed:
  • Ng, ManWo

Abstract

Chassis shortage and, especially, dislocation have become major recurring challenges for the maritime industry in the U.S. To prevent chassis dislocation, chassis pool managers at container ports can work with third-party repositioning partners to pro-actively reposition chassis between the different chassis storage yards within the port complex. One challenge that arises in practice is that not all repositioning requests made by the chassis pool manager are fulfilled, i.e. repositioning partners can be unreliable. This paper contributes to our understanding of the impact of unreliable repositioning partners on chassis shortages by presenting a stochastic model to describe the day-to-day evolution of chassis at container ports. Expressions for the chassis shortage probability and the expected time until a shortage are rigorously derived. Using a detailed case study employing real-world data, (counterintuitive) managerial insights are revealed and discussed that can be used to help formulate policies when managing chassis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ng, ManWo, 2024. "Repositioning with unreliable carriers: The case of marine chassis equipment at container ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 777-785.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:2:p:777-785
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723009475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:2:p:777-785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.