IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v315y2024i2p580-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fighting pickpocketing using a choice-based resource allocation model

Author

Listed:
  • Schlicher, Loe
  • Lurkin, Virginie

Abstract

Inspired by European actions to fight organized crimes, we develop a choice-based resource allocation model that can help policy makers to reduce the number of pickpocket attempts. In this model, the policy maker needs to allocate a limited budget over local and central protective resources as well as over potential pickpocket locations, while keeping in mind the thieves’ random preferences towards potential pickpocket locations. We prove that the optimal budget allocation is proportional in (i) the thieves’ sensitivity towards protective resources and (ii) the initial attractiveness of the potential pickpocket locations. On top of this, we also study two alternatives of our choice-based resource allocation model: one where pickpocket probabilities are enforced to be equal over the pickpocket locations, and one where the decision-making process of the thief becomes deterministic, with known preferences, as observed by the policy maker. For both alternatives, we also derive the optimal budget allocation and compare it with the initial budget allocation using numerical experiments. Finally, we illustrate how these optimal budget allocations perform against various others budget allocations, proposed by policy makers from the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Schlicher, Loe & Lurkin, Virginie, 2024. "Fighting pickpocketing using a choice-based resource allocation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 580-595.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:2:p:580-595
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723009153
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:2:p:580-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.