IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v314y2024i2p735-746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new cross-efficiency meta-frontier analysis method with good ability to identify technology gaps

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Ruiyue
  • Peng, Yudan

Abstract

Cross-efficiency evaluation and meta-frontier analysis (MFA) have been widely used to measure performance in many areas. However, cross-efficiency MFA (CMFA) has rarely been studied due to its potential violation of the basic MFA property, that is, the efficiency relative to the group frontier is not less than that relative to the meta-frontier. In this paper, we deduce the conditions under which the cross-efficiency score generated by the current CMFA method relative to the group frontier is smaller than that relative to the meta-frontier, and the conditions under which the current CMFA method is unable to identify the technical gaps between the group frontiers and the meta-frontier. To guarantee the basic property and identify technical gaps, we introduce a new CMFA method, where the efficiencies relative to the group frontiers are first cross-evaluated by the traditional cross-evaluation approach and then those relative to the meta-frontier are cross-evaluated by using modified data envelopment analysis models. Compared with the existing CMFA method, our approach has the following advantages: it can successfully ensure that the cross-efficiencies and cross-efficiency scores relative to the group frontiers are not less than those relative to the meta-frontier; it has a good identification of technology gaps and provides more detailed information about the inefficiency; all the mathematical programming models involved in our CMFA method are feasible. Theoretical analyses and numerical examples support the practicality and superiority of our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Ruiyue & Peng, Yudan, 2024. "A new cross-efficiency meta-frontier analysis method with good ability to identify technology gaps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 735-746.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:314:y:2024:i:2:p:735-746
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723008093
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:314:y:2024:i:2:p:735-746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.