IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v314y2024i1p229-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product innovation in a supply chain with information asymmetry: Is more private information always worse?

Author

Listed:
  • Ni, Jian
  • Xu, Yue
  • Shi, Jia
  • Li, Jiali

Abstract

This study investigates supply chain innovation under different degrees of information asymmetry. The supplier could be uncertain about either the manufacturer's production cost or innovation capability, or both, leading to the existence of relatively less or more private information that can distort innovation investment. We find that the effects of different degrees of information asymmetry on supply chain innovation can be complicated. While information asymmetry can often cause underinvestment in innovation, such an underinvestment problem could be substantially mitigated with more private information, and even more so when customer demand is sensitive to price. This counter-intuitive finding can be understood as a consequence of the relatively stronger innovation-motivation motive but weaker profit-extraction motive of the supplier facing more private information. We further examine the effects of CSR undertaking in supply chain, and show that the underinvestment in innovation would still deteriorate with less private information. Thus, one should be cautious towards information sharing schemes that partially reduce information asymmetry of supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Ni, Jian & Xu, Yue & Shi, Jia & Li, Jiali, 2024. "Product innovation in a supply chain with information asymmetry: Is more private information always worse?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 229-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:314:y:2024:i:1:p:229-240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723007993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:314:y:2024:i:1:p:229-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.