IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v313y2024i3p992-1014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New benchmark instances for the inventory routing problem

Author

Listed:
  • Skålnes, Jørgen
  • Ben Ahmed, Mohamed
  • Hvattum, Lars Magnus
  • Stålhane, Magnus

Abstract

The existing sets of benchmark instances for the inventory routing problem (IRP) have been beneficial for investigating and illustrating the properties of the problem. However, they possess certain features and design choices that are not necessarily representative of all real-world IRPs. Therefore, we propose a new collection of 270 real-world-like instances ranging from 10 to 200 customers. These instances vary in terms of the number of vehicles and their capacity, the length of the planning horizon, the demand structure, and the geographical distribution of customers. Transportation and inventory holding costs resemble costs found in practice. We present an instance space analysis showing that the new instances nicely complement the original instances. To derive lower and upper bounds for each instance, we present computational experiments with two high-quality solution methods: a matheuristic and an exact branch-and-cut method. The results confirm that the new set of instances is hard to solve with the proposed methods, and they demonstrate the need for developing new solution methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Skålnes, Jørgen & Ben Ahmed, Mohamed & Hvattum, Lars Magnus & Stålhane, Magnus, 2024. "New benchmark instances for the inventory routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 992-1014.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:313:y:2024:i:3:p:992-1014
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172300615X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:313:y:2024:i:3:p:992-1014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.