IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v313y2024i1p112-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity and surgery partitioning: An approach for improving surgery scheduling in the inpatient surgical department

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Lien
  • Demeulemeester, Erik
  • Vansteenkiste, Nancy
  • Rademakers, Frank E.

Abstract

In hospitals, efficiently scheduling operating rooms (ORs) is challenging, especially for an inpatient surgical department where complex and long surgeries with different surgery types are often performed in combination with surgeries on emergency patients. Although pooling ORs for surgeries could counter various uncertainties, all ORs might be disrupted. To improve the scheduling of the inpatient department, this paper develops a promising scheduling approach (namely OR capacity and surgery partitioning) which separates in surgery scheduling the more predictable elective surgeries (MPS) from the less predictable elective and emergency surgeries. To study the effect of partitioning, we apply Markov decision process, linear programming and simulation models, while incorporating surgeons’ preferences for using one OR for a whole day. Based on extensive numerical experiments, we report important findings. First, the partitioning can considerably reduce the cancellation rate without damaging the OR utilization. Meanwhile, an overflow must be allowed to schedule elective patients across OR subgroups rather than sticking to complete partitioning. Second, to better partition surgeries into subgroups, it is important to consider both surgery duration length and variability, while those surgeries with a better bin-packing nature should be given more consideration than those with a smaller surgery duration variability in the MPS ORs. Third, the benefit of partitioning increases with a larger surgery duration uncertainty and a growing non-elective demand. This framework is an easy-to-implement way to manage various variabilities and complexities in the inpatient surgical department. Our findings can help OR managers to better perform partitioning and guide surgery scheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Lien & Demeulemeester, Erik & Vansteenkiste, Nancy & Rademakers, Frank E., 2024. "Capacity and surgery partitioning: An approach for improving surgery scheduling in the inpatient surgical department," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 112-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:313:y:2024:i:1:p:112-128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723006215
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:313:y:2024:i:1:p:112-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.