IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v287y2020i3p946-963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Front-office multitasking between service encounters and back-office tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Legros, Benjamin
  • Jouini, Oualid
  • Akşin, O. Zeynep
  • Koole, Ger

Abstract

We model the work of a front-line service worker as a queueing system. The server interacts with customers in a multi-stage process with random durations. Some stages require an interaction between server and customer, while other stages are performed by the customer as a self-service task or with the help of another resource. Random arrivals by customers at the beginning and during an encounter create random lengths of idle time in the work of the server (breaks and interludes respectively). The server considers treatment of an infinite amount of back-office tasks, or tasks that do not require interaction with the customer, during these idle times. We consider an optimal control problem for the server’s work. The main question we explore is whether to use the interludes in service encounters for treating back-office, when the latter incur switching times. Under certain operating environments, working on back-office during interludes is shown to be valuable. Switching times play a critical role in the optimal control of the server’s work, at times leading the server to prefer remaining idle during breaks and interludes, instead of working on back-office, and at others to continue back-office in the presence of waiting customers. The optimal policy for use of the interludes is one with multiple thresholds depending on both the customers queueing for service, and the ones who are in-service. We illustrate that in settings with multiple interludes in an encounter, if at all, the back-office work should be concentrated on fewer, longer and later interludes.

Suggested Citation

  • Legros, Benjamin & Jouini, Oualid & Akşin, O. Zeynep & Koole, Ger, 2020. "Front-office multitasking between service encounters and back-office tasks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 946-963.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:287:y:2020:i:3:p:946-963
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172030401X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Dobson & Tolga Tezcan & Vera Tilson, 2013. "Optimal Workflow Decisions for Investigators in Systems with Interruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1125-1141, May.
    2. Andreas Brandt & Manfred Brandt, 1999. "On a Two-Queue Priority System with Impatience and its Application to a Call Center," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 191-210, September.
    3. Benjamin Legros & Oualid Jouini & Ger Koole, 2015. "Adaptive threshold policies for multi-channel call centers," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 414-430, April.
    4. Legros, Benjamin & Jouini, Oualid, 2019. "On the scheduling of operations in a chat contact center," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 303-316.
    5. Galit B. Yom-Tov & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2014. "Erlang-R: A Time-Varying Queue with Reentrant Customers, in Support of Healthcare Staffing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 283-299, May.
    6. Mandyam M. Srinivasan & Diwakar Gupta, 1996. "When Should a Roving Server Be Patient?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 437-451, March.
    7. Matthew F. Keblis & Maomao Chen, 2006. "Improving Customer Service Operations at Amazon.com," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 433-445, October.
    8. Mor Armony & Constantinos Maglaras, 2004. "Contact Centers with a Call-Back Option and Real-Time Delay Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 527-545, August.
    9. Guillaume Roels, 2014. "Optimal Design of Coproductive Services: Interaction and Work Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 578-594, October.
    10. Tolga Tezcan & Jiheng Zhang, 2014. "Routing and Staffing in Customer Service Chat Systems with Impatient Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 943-956, August.
    11. Izak Duenyas & Diwakar Gupta & Tava Lennon Olsen, 1998. "Control of a Single-Server Tandem Queueing System with Setups," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 218-230, April.
    12. Noah Gans & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2003. "A Call-Routing Problem with Service-Level Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 255-271, April.
    13. J. G. Dai & G. Weiss, 1996. "Stability and Instability of Fluid Models for Reentrant Lines," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 115-134, February.
    14. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2017. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 882-900, March.
    15. Leon Cui & Tolga Tezcan, 2016. "Approximations for Chat Service Systems Using Many-Server Diffusion Limits," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 775-807, August.
    16. H. Christian Gromoll & Philippe Robert & Bert Zwart, 2008. "Fluid Limits for Processor-Sharing Queues with Impatience," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 375-402, May.
    17. Gregory Dobson & Hsiao-Hui Lee & Arvind Sainathan & Vera Tilson, 2012. "A Queueing Model to Evaluate the Impact of Patient "Batching" on Throughput and Flow Time in a Medical Teaching Facility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 584-599, October.
    18. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2001. "Server Assignment Policies for Maximizing the Steady-State Throughput of Finite Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1421-1439, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barış Balcıog̃lu & Odysseas Kanavetas, 2022. "A dynamic prioritization policy for the callback option in a call center," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 40-64, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Legros, Benjamin & Jouini, Oualid, 2019. "On the scheduling of operations in a chat contact center," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 303-316.
    2. Miao Yu & Yu Zhao & Chunguang Chang & Liangliang Sun, 2023. "Fluid models for customer service web chat systems with interactive automated service," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 572-598, June.
    3. Ingolfsson, Armann & Almehdawe, Eman & Pedram, Ali & Tran, Monica, 2020. "Comparison of fluid approximations for service systems with state-dependent service rates and return probabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 562-575.
    4. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2017. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 882-900, March.
    5. Gregory Dobson & Hsiao-Hui Lee & Arvind Sainathan & Vera Tilson, 2012. "A Queueing Model to Evaluate the Impact of Patient "Batching" on Throughput and Flow Time in a Medical Teaching Facility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 584-599, October.
    6. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2018. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 7-26, January.
    7. Gabriel Zayas-Cabán & Jingui Xie & Linda V. Green & Mark E. Lewis, 2016. "Dynamic control of a tandem system with abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 279-293, December.
    8. Benjamin Legros & Sihan Ding & Rob Mei & Oualid Jouini, 2017. "Call centers with a postponed callback offer," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1097-1125, October.
    9. Mor Armony & Constantinos Maglaras, 2004. "On Customer Contact Centers with a Call-Back Option: Customer Decisions, Routing Rules, and System Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 271-292, April.
    10. Ramesh Arumugam & Maria Mayorga & Kevin Taaffe, 2009. "Inventory based allocation policies for flexible servers in serial systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2010. "Robustness of efficient server assignment policies to service time distributions in finite‐buffered lines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(6), pages 563-582, September.
    12. Paulo B. Goes & Noyan Ilk & Mingfeng Lin & J. Leon Zhao, 2018. "When More Is Less: Field Evidence on Unintended Consequences of Multitasking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3033-3054, July.
    13. R. K. Jha & B. S. Sahay & P. Charan, 2016. "Healthcare operations management: a structured literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 43(3), pages 259-279, September.
    14. Carri W. Chan & Linda V. Green & Suparerk Lekwijit & Lijian Lu & Gabriel Escobar, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Service Level When Customer Needs Are Uncertain: An Empirical Investigation of Hospital Step-Down Units," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 751-775, February.
    15. Yi‐Chun Tsai & Nilay Tanık Argon, 2008. "Dynamic server assignment policies for assembly‐type queues with flexible servers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 234-251, April.
    16. Noa Zychlinski, 2023. "Applications of fluid models in service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 161-185, February.
    17. Tuğçe Işık & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2022. "Dynamic Control of Non‐Collaborative Workers When Reassignment Is Costly," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1332-1352, March.
    18. Peng Wang & Kai Pan & Zhenzhen Yan & Yun Fong Lim, 2022. "Managing Stochastic Bucket Brigades on Discrete Work Stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 358-373, January.
    19. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2012. "Flexible Servers in Understaffed Tandem Lines," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 761-777, July.
    20. Junfei Huang & Boaz Carmeli & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2015. "Control of Patient Flow in Emergency Departments, or Multiclass Queues with Deadlines and Feedback," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 892-908, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:287:y:2020:i:3:p:946-963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.