IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v223y2012i2p304-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement sets and vector optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Gutiérrez, C.
  • Jiménez, B.
  • Novo, V.

Abstract

In this paper we focus on minimal points in linear spaces and minimal solutions of vector optimization problems, where the preference relation is defined via an improvement set E. To be precise, we extend the notion of E-optimal point due to Chicco et al. in [4] to a general (non-necessarily Pareto) quasi ordered linear space and we study its properties. In particular, we relate the notion of improvement set with other similar concepts of the literature and we characterize it by means of sublevel sets of scalar functions. Moreover, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for E-optimal solutions of vector optimization problems through scalarization processes by assuming convexity assumptions and also in the general (nonconvex) case. By applying the obtained results to certain improvement sets we generalize well-known results of the literature referred to efficient, weak efficient and approximate efficient solutions of vector optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gutiérrez, C. & Jiménez, B. & Novo, V., 2012. "Improvement sets and vector optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 304-311.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:223:y:2012:i:2:p:304-311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712004559
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. B. G. Frenk & G. Kassay, 1999. "On Classes of Generalized Convex Functions, Gordan–Farkas Type Theorems, and Lagrangian Duality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 315-343, August.
    2. M. Chicco & F. Mignanego & L. Pusillo & S. Tijs, 2011. "Vector Optimization Problems via Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 516-529, September.
    3. Gutiérrez, C. & Jiménez, B. & Novo, V., 2010. "Optimality conditions via scalarization for a new [epsilon]-efficiency concept in vector optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 11-22, February.
    4. C. Gutiérrez & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2006. "On Approximate Efficiency in Multiobjective Programming," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(1), pages 165-185, August.
    5. C. Gutiérrez & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2011. "A generic approach to approximate efficiency and applications to vector optimization with set-valued maps," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 313-342, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pirro Oppezzi & Anna Rossi, 2015. "Improvement Sets and Convergence of Optimal Points," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 405-419, May.
    2. Ovidiu Bagdasar & Nicolae Popovici, 2018. "Unifying local–global type properties in vector optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 155-179, October.
    3. C. Gutiérrez & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2015. "Optimality Conditions for Quasi-Solutions of Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 796-820, December.
    4. Jiawei Chen & La Huang & Shengjie Li, 2018. "Separations and Optimality of Constrained Multiobjective Optimization via Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 794-823, September.
    5. Zhiang Zhou & Wang Chen & Xinmin Yang, 2019. "Scalarizations and Optimality of Constrained Set-Valued Optimization Using Improvement Sets and Image Space Analysis," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 944-962, December.
    6. Fabián Flores-Bazán & Fernando Flores-Bazán & Sigifredo Laengle, 2015. "Characterizing Efficiency on Infinite-dimensional Commodity Spaces with Ordering Cones Having Possibly Empty Interior," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 455-478, February.
    7. Nguyen Xuan Hai & Nguyen Hong Quan & Vo Viet Tri, 2023. "Some saddle-point theorems for vector-valued functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 141-161, May.
    8. Maurizio Chicco & Anna Rossi, 2015. "Existence of Optimal Points Via Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 487-501, November.
    9. C. Gutiérrez & L. Huerga & E. Köbis & C. Tammer, 2021. "A scalarization scheme for binary relations with applications to set-valued and robust optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 233-256, January.
    10. Ying Gao & Xin-Min Yang, 2019. "Properties of the nonlinear scalar functional and its applications to vector optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 869-889, April.
    11. C. S. Lalitha & Prashanto Chatterjee, 2015. "Stability and Scalarization in Vector Optimization Using Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 825-843, September.
    12. C. Gutiérrez & L. Huerga & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2018. "Approximate solutions of vector optimization problems via improvement sets in real linear spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 875-901, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. S. Lalitha & Prashanto Chatterjee, 2015. "Stability and Scalarization in Vector Optimization Using Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 825-843, September.
    2. Maurizio Chicco & Anna Rossi, 2015. "Existence of Optimal Points Via Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 487-501, November.
    3. M. Chicco & F. Mignanego & L. Pusillo & S. Tijs, 2011. "Vector Optimization Problems via Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 516-529, September.
    4. C. Gutiérrez & L. Huerga & V. Novo & C. Tammer, 2016. "Duality related to approximate proper solutions of vector optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 117-139, January.
    5. Fabián Flores-Bazán & Fernando Flores-Bazán & Sigifredo Laengle, 2015. "Characterizing Efficiency on Infinite-dimensional Commodity Spaces with Ordering Cones Having Possibly Empty Interior," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 455-478, February.
    6. Ying Gao & Xin-Min Yang, 2019. "Properties of the nonlinear scalar functional and its applications to vector optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 869-889, April.
    7. C. Gutiérrez & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2011. "A generic approach to approximate efficiency and applications to vector optimization with set-valued maps," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 313-342, February.
    8. C. Gutiérrez & L. Huerga & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2020. "Optimality conditions for approximate proper solutions in multiobjective optimization with polyhedral cones," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 526-544, July.
    9. C. Gutiérrez & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2015. "Optimality Conditions for Quasi-Solutions of Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 796-820, December.
    10. Maria C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2016. "On the Fritz John saddle point problem for differentiable multiobjective optimization," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 917-933, December.
    11. Radu Boţ & Sorin-Mihai Grad & Gert Wanka, 2007. "A general approach for studying duality in multiobjective optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 65(3), pages 417-444, June.
    12. Frenk, J.B.G. & Kassay, G., 2005. "Lagrangian duality and cone convexlike functions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-019-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Villacorta, Kely D.V. & Oliveira, P. Roberto, 2011. "An interior proximal method in vector optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 485-492, November.
    14. C. Gutiérrez & L. Huerga & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2018. "Approximate solutions of vector optimization problems via improvement sets in real linear spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 875-901, April.
    15. Pirro Oppezzi & Anna Rossi, 2015. "Improvement Sets and Convergence of Optimal Points," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 405-419, May.
    16. L. P. Hai & L. Huerga & P. Q. Khanh & V. Novo, 2019. "Variants of the Ekeland variational principle for approximate proper solutions of vector equilibrium problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 361-382, June.
    17. M. Adán & V. Novo, 2004. "Proper Efficiency in Vector Optimization on Real Linear Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 515-540, June.
    18. Thai Doan Chuong, 2022. "Approximate solutions in nonsmooth and nonconvex cone constrained vector optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 997-1015, April.
    19. Giorgio Giorgi, 2014. "Again on the Farkas Theorem and the Tucker Key Theorem Proved Easily," DEM Working Papers Series 094, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    20. C. Gutiérrez & R. López & J. Martínez, 2022. "Generalized $${\varepsilon }$$ ε -quasi solutions of set optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 559-576, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:223:y:2012:i:2:p:304-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.